Offensive Volatile Substances Laws in Canada Explained

By Last Updated: June 6, 2024

What is an offensive volatile substances charge?

Offensive Volatile Substances Charges in CanadaOffensive volatile substances are covered under s.178 of the Criminal Code found in Part V. Part V covers “Sexual Offences, Public Morals and Disorderly Conduct.” Offensive volatile substances are a summary offence. This offence was repealed in 2018.

An offensive volatile substances offence applies to everyone except a peace officer. This offence occurs when a person deposits, throws or injects an offensive volatile substance that could alarm, inconvenience, discommode or cause discomfort to people or damage to property. One example of this is a stench or stink bomb, which is given a separate section in 178(b), compared to (a) which refers to a substance more broadly. The term offensive volatile substances is not defined, as it is left to the discretion of the court to do so.

Examples

Some examples of offensive volatile substances may include the following:

  • A person throwing a smoke bomb in public;
  • A person spraying pepper spray into a crowd; or
  • A person spraying tear gas into a crowd.

Defences

The defences available for an offensive volatile substance charge are entirely dependent on the facts of your case.

However, some defences to an offensive volatile substance charge may include:

  • The accused is a police officer;
  • The substance is not an offensive volatile substance;
  • The substance was not intentionally used; and
  • The accused was wrongly identified.

Punishments

An offensive volatile substance charge is a summary offence which entails a maximum punishment as follows:

  • Imprisonment for a term not exceeding 6 months.

An offensive volatile substance charge can also entail severe consequences for current and future employment opportunities and immigration status.

Have you been charged with Obstructing or Violence to or Arrest of Officiating Clergyman?

Our experienced team of criminal defence lawyers is standing by to help you fight the charge. Contact us today for a free, no-obligation consultation to discuss the specifics of your case and craft a formidable defence.

Call Now 1-866-939-5940

Overview of the Offence 

According to s. 178 of the Criminal Code:

178 Every one other than a peace officer engaged in the discharge of his duty who has in his possession in a public place or who deposits, throws or injects or causes to be deposited, thrown or injected in, into or near any place,

(a) an offensive volatile substance that is likely to alarm, inconvenience, discommode or cause discomfort to any person or to cause damage to property, or

(b) a stink or stench bomb or device from which any substance mentioned in paragraph (a) is or is capable of being liberated,

is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.

The Guilty Act (Actus Reus)

The actus reus for an offensive volatile substances charge under s.178 is established by proof, beyond a reasonable doubt, of the following:

  • The accused is not a police officer engaged in the discharge of their duty;
  • The accused possesses an offensive volatile substance, including, but not limited to, a stench or stink bomb;
  • The accused deposits, throws or injects this volatile substance, or causes it to be deposited, thrown or injected; and
  • The substance is likely to alarm, inconvenience, discommode or cause discomfort to a person or damage property.

The Guilty Mind (Mens Rea)

The mens rea for an offensive volatile substances charge under s.178 includes proving, beyond a reasonable doubt, that:

  • The accused intentionally possessed and deposited an offensive volatile substance.

Defences

How to Beat an Offensive Volatile Substance Charge

Every case is different. The availability and strength of any defence depend entirely on the specific facts of your case. The strength of any available defence rests on the evidence against you and the precise details of the allegations. However, the following are some common defences that may be used when fighting a offensive volatile substances charge.

Accused is a Police Officer

One defence for an offensive volatile substances defence is that the accused is a police officer actively executing their duty. Police officers executing their duties are notably excluded from this offence, as they may be required to use offensive volatile substances for crowd control during events such as riots. Thus, if the accused can prove they are a police officer who was executing their duty at the time of the incident, the offence would be inapplicable to them. 

Identity

Depending on the circumstances of your case, a possible defence to a possession of explosives without lawful excuse charge may be to raise an identity defence. In this case, for this defence to be raised successfully, you will have to prove that you were not the person who possessed the explosive substance.

No Intention

Another defence for an offensive volatile substance charge is that the accused did not intend to possess and use the volatile substance. An offensive volatile substance charge requires that the accused intended to possess and apply a volatile substance. If the accused did not intend to possess or use the volatile substance, they would fail to meet this requirement and may be found not guilty of the offence.

Substance is not an Offensive Volatile Substance

The substances referred to in this section are offensive volatile substances. This term is not defined in the Criminal Code to give the courts the interpretation of this term in individual cases. However, we are given information as to what an offensive volatile substance is. s. 178 defined these substances as being likely to alarm, inconvenience, discommode or discomfort a person or cause damage to property. Further, a specific example, a stink bomb, is provided. Thus, if the accused can prove the substance in question in their case does not fall under this definition, this actus reus element would not be met.

Any Applicable Charter Defences

The Charter sets out your rights and freedoms before and after your arrest. If the police fail to abide by these rights deliberately or inadvertently, it could aid in your defence. If any of your Charter rights have been violated before or after your arrest, you may be able to have some or all of the evidence that the Crown is relying on to secure a conviction excluded under s. 24(2) of the Charter.

Punishments

The Criminal Code provides for a possible maximum term of imprisonment of no more than 6 months for those convicted of a possession of explosives without lawful excuse charge. Since the Crown can only proceed summarily, the maximum punishment is no more than 6 months of incarceration and/or a $5,000 fine.

Persons found guilty of possession of explosives without lawful excuse are eligible for sentencing entailing a discharge, suspended sentence, stand-alone fine, custody, custody with a fine or probation or a conditional sentence order.

Frequently Asked Questions  

Can you go to jail for offensive volatile substances?

If you are found guilty of offensive volatile substance, you can go to jail. Offensive volatile substances is a summary offence with the maximum punishment is no more than 6 months of incarceration and/or a $5,000 fine. Therefore, there is a possibility that you can go to jail for an offensive volatile substances charge.

What is the maximum penalty for offensive volatile substances?

The maximum penalty for an offensive volatile substances charge will vary depending on the severity and circumstances of your case. Offensive volatile substances is a summary offence with the maximum punishment is no more than 6 months of incarceration and/or a $5,000 fine.

Is offensive volatile substances an indictable offence?

Possession of explosives without lawful excuse is a summary offence. This means that the Crown cannot choose to proceed by indictment. Since it is prosecuted summarily, the maximum punishment is no more than 6 months of incarceration and/or a $5,000 fine. Therefore, offensive volatile substances is not an indictable offence.

Published Decisions

R v Lazore, 2008 ONCJ 578

Lazore provides a list of offences and their maximum sentences. This case confirms that the maximum penalty for an offensive volatile substance offence is 6 months and that the maximum fine is $2,000.

You can read the full decision here.

Contact Us

If you have been charged with a criminal offence, visit our location pages to contact our team.

About The Author

Michael Oykhman

Managing Partner

Michael Oykhman is a senior lawyer and founder of Strategic Criminal Defence, a full-service criminal law firm with central law offices across Western Canada and Ontario.

My professional experience consists of countless court appearances and thousands of successful defences and satisfied clients. Over the last 10 years, I have worked to build a law office where all the lawyers share our collective experience, resources, and passion to help people. Our team approach to legal representation is client–rather than only law–centred. We look for opportunities to add value to our clients through strategic thinking and creative solutions.

Ask A Question

We endeavor to respond to questions within 24 hours. If your matter is urgent, please call our office or submit a request for a free consultation.

Client Reviews

Michael Oykhman is a very professional lawyer and the first time I spoke to him he asked about my situation and he gave me some very helpful advice and assistance and also told me his odds of winning this case. During the days I was in contact with micheal I could feel the level of professionalism of him and his team, he is able to respond back to you with any questions you have within 24 hours. In the end he was as successful in helping me win my case as he had initially promised me.If you are still struggling to find a lawyer, I highly recommend Michael Oykhman.

R.W.

Please give yourself a favour and contact Mr. Michael Oykhman if you need any legal advice or if you are in a terrible situation. Even-tough, the odds are not in your favour, still they will go extra miles to help you out in bad situation and get you favourable outcome. Moreover, They will work on your file even after the business hours. I don’t have words to say thanks to Mr. Michael oykhman and Kiran Cheema who had worked on my file and get me out of trouble. I’m very grateful for your assistance and exceptional service. HIGHLY RECOMMENDED.

Y.

I am grateful that Ms. Moira McAvoy was my lawyer, and I remain thankful to her for everything. She made a successful resolution to my case possible. Ms. Moira McAvoy is a professional, trustworthy lawyer, and a compassionate person. She is an excellent listener and knowledgeable of the law. From the start, she was an excellent guide. I did not know anything about the legal system and court, and she outlined everything clearly in advance, so I could understand things. She never rushed me through anything. She spoke clearly, explained everything, considered what I said, and provided options and advice. She kept me up to date on new information, requirements, and deadlines. She was always positive and this helped so much.

C.S.

Ryan Patmore and his team are simply the best. I was bullied by CPS in 2020 and it landed me with three separate charges, assault, refusal to blow and DUI, which all went down as I was parked at a friends. After some research and a conversation with Michael, he directed me towards Ryan and at the time I didn’t know that would be a game changer in my favour! He is honest, transparent, helpful and a brilliant mind. He successfully appealed my license suspension with ATSB and then proceeded to get the crown to dismiss all my charges before trial. I never had to step foot inside a courtroom. If you are in need of a criminal defence lawyer, don’t think twice, get in touch with this firm and ask for Ryan Patmore! The guy is an absolute saviour.

A.P.

Joseph Beller, from the very beginning when I first contacted and then retained Joseph as my representative I felt I was in good hands. When I emailed him with a question. I got a prompt response. We communicated often on the phone as needed. Joseph kept me informed as to the process. He made sure I knew all the potential results so I knew and could plan for the different outcomes. I know this his his job. But appreciate his professionalism and also his ability to not make me feel any extra stress. Well done.

N.B.
READ OUR REVIEWS
GET A FREE CONSULTATION