Offensive Weapons and Explosives on Aircraft Laws in Canada Explained

By Last Updated: June 6, 2024

What is a charge of Offensive weapons and explosives on an aircraft?

Offensive weapons and explosives on aircraft Charges in CanadaOffensive weapons and explosives on an aircraft is covered under 78 of the Criminal Code of Canada. Offensive weapons and explosives on an aircraft occurs when a person, other than a peace officer authorized by law in the execution of his/her duty, knowingly brings an offensive weapon or explosive substance onto an aircraft.

Offensive weapons and explosives in an aircraft is a straight indictable offence.

Examples

Some examples of a charge of offensive weapons and explosives in an aircraft may include the following:

  • Bringing a knife or edged weapon onto an aircraft, or attempting to bring one through airport security and onto aircraft.
  • Bringing a firearm or gun onto an aircraft, or attempting to bring one through the airport security and onto aircraft.
  • Bringing a pipe bomb or explosive device onto an aircraft

Defences 

The defences available to a charge of Offensive Weapons and Explosives on an Aircraft are entirely dependent on the facts of your case.

However, some defences to a charge of Offensive Weapons and Explosives on an Aircraft may include:

  • The accused was wrongly identified as the person who committed the offence or brought the weapon onto the aircraft
  • The accused did not intend to bring an offensive weapon or explosive device onto an aircraft
  • The accused was mistaken in bringing an item deemed as an offensive weapon or explosive onto an aircraft

Punishment

A charge of Offensive Weapons and Explosives on an Aircraft is a straight indictable offence, which entails a maximum punishment as follows:

  • If the crown proceeds by indictable, Imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen (14) years incarceration.

Punishments for Offensive weapons and explosives on an aircraft are considered serious by the court, and are a straight indictable offence. The maximum is no more than 14 years of incarceration. A charge of offensive weapons and explosives on an aircraft can also entail severe consequences for current and future employment opportunities, as well as future travel restrictions.

Have you been charged with Conversion Therapy?

Our experienced team of criminal defence lawyers is standing by to help you fight the charge. Contact us today for a free, no-obligation consultation to discuss the specifics of your case and craft a formidable defence.

Call Now 1-866-939-5940

Overview of the Offence 

According to s. 78.1 of the Criminal Code:

Offensive weapons and explosive substances

  • 78 (1) Every one, other than a peace officer engaged in the execution of his duty, who takes on board a civil aircraft an offensive weapon or any explosive substance
    • (a) without the consent of the owner or operator of the aircraft or of a person duly authorized by either of them to consent thereto, or
    • (b) with the consent referred to in paragraph (a) but without complying with all terms and conditions on which the consent was given,
  • is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.

The Guilty Act (Actus Reus)

The actus reus for a charge of offensive weapons and explosives on an aircraft under s.78 is established by proof, beyond a reasonable doubt, of the following:

  • The accused was in possession of, or had knowledge, consent, and control of, an offensive weapon or explosive, which was brought, or attempted to be brought onto an aircraft, and did not have the permission of the owner or operator

The Guilty Mind (Mens Rea)

The mens rea for a charge of offensive weapons and explosives on an aircraft under s. 78 includes proving, beyond a reasonable doubt, that:

  • The accused, knowing that their actions were unauthorized, brought, or attempting to bring, in their possession, an offensive weapon or explosive onto an aircraft

Defences

How to Beat a Charge of offensive weapons and explosives on an aircraft

Every case is different. The availability and strength of any defence depend entirely on the specific facts of your case. The strength of any available defence rests on the evidence against you and the precise details of the allegations. However, the following are some common defences that may be used when fighting an Offensive Weapons and Explosives on an aircraft charge:

Factual innocence

A strong defence against a charge of offensive weapon and explosives on an aircraft is to maintain that you are factually innocent. If you can show that the facts and the evidence do not support that you brought, or attempting to bring, an offensive weapon or explosive onto an aircraft, then you may have a defence that you were factually innocent.

Lack of Intent/Mistake

If you can show that you were never seeking to commit the offence and were merely accidentally transporting these items, or mistakenly brought the items, then this may be a defence for this charge, however, this should be taken on a case-by-case basis. For you to be convicted of offensive weapons and explosives on an aircraft, the crown must prove that you had knowledge that your actions would result in this charge. If this cannot be proved this could be a suitable defence.

Identity

Depending on the circumstances of your case, a possible defence to an offensive weapons and explosives on an aircraft charge may be to raise an identity defence. In this case, for this defence to be raised successfully, you will have to prove that you were not the person who committed the prohibited acts.

Any applicable Charter defences

The Charter sets out your rights and freedoms before and after your arrest. If the police fail to abide by these rights deliberately or inadvertently, it could aid in your defence. If any of your Charter rights have been violated before or after your arrest, you may be able to have some or all of the evidence that the Crown is relying on to secure a conviction excluded under s. 24(2) of the Charter.

Punishments

The Criminal Code provides for a possible maximum term of imprisonment of no more than 14 years for those convicted of an Offensive Weapons on an aircraft charge.

Frequently Asked Questions  

Is Offensive Weapons and Explosives on an Aircraft an indictable offence?

Offensive weapon and explosives on an aircraft is a straight indictable offence. This means that the crown prosecutor is required to proceed by indictment.

Can you go to jail for Offensive Weapons and Explosives on an Aircraft?

If you are convicted of Offensive Weapons and explosives on an aircraft, you can go to jail. A charge of Offensive weapons and explosives on an aircraft carries a maximum sentence of no more than 14 years in jail if convicted.

Contact Us

If you have been charged with a criminal offence, visit our location pages to contact our team.

About The Author

Michael Oykhman

Managing Partner

Michael Oykhman is a senior lawyer and founder of Strategic Criminal Defence, a full-service criminal law firm with central law offices across Western Canada and Ontario.

My professional experience consists of countless court appearances and thousands of successful defences and satisfied clients. Over the last 10 years, I have worked to build a law office where all the lawyers share our collective experience, resources, and passion to help people. Our team approach to legal representation is client–rather than only law–centred. We look for opportunities to add value to our clients through strategic thinking and creative solutions.

Ask A Question

We endeavor to respond to questions within 24 hours. If your matter is urgent, please call our office or submit a request for a free consultation.

Client Reviews

Michael Oykhman is a very professional lawyer and the first time I spoke to him he asked about my situation and he gave me some very helpful advice and assistance and also told me his odds of winning this case. During the days I was in contact with micheal I could feel the level of professionalism of him and his team, he is able to respond back to you with any questions you have within 24 hours. In the end he was as successful in helping me win my case as he had initially promised me.If you are still struggling to find a lawyer, I highly recommend Michael Oykhman.

R.W.

Please give yourself a favour and contact Mr. Michael Oykhman if you need any legal advice or if you are in a terrible situation. Even-tough, the odds are not in your favour, still they will go extra miles to help you out in bad situation and get you favourable outcome. Moreover, They will work on your file even after the business hours. I don’t have words to say thanks to Mr. Michael oykhman and Kiran Cheema who had worked on my file and get me out of trouble. I’m very grateful for your assistance and exceptional service. HIGHLY RECOMMENDED.

Y.

I am grateful that Ms. Moira McAvoy was my lawyer, and I remain thankful to her for everything. She made a successful resolution to my case possible. Ms. Moira McAvoy is a professional, trustworthy lawyer, and a compassionate person. She is an excellent listener and knowledgeable of the law. From the start, she was an excellent guide. I did not know anything about the legal system and court, and she outlined everything clearly in advance, so I could understand things. She never rushed me through anything. She spoke clearly, explained everything, considered what I said, and provided options and advice. She kept me up to date on new information, requirements, and deadlines. She was always positive and this helped so much.

C.S.

Ryan Patmore and his team are simply the best. I was bullied by CPS in 2020 and it landed me with three separate charges, assault, refusal to blow and DUI, which all went down as I was parked at a friends. After some research and a conversation with Michael, he directed me towards Ryan and at the time I didn’t know that would be a game changer in my favour! He is honest, transparent, helpful and a brilliant mind. He successfully appealed my license suspension with ATSB and then proceeded to get the crown to dismiss all my charges before trial. I never had to step foot inside a courtroom. If you are in need of a criminal defence lawyer, don’t think twice, get in touch with this firm and ask for Ryan Patmore! The guy is an absolute saviour.

A.P.

Joseph Beller, from the very beginning when I first contacted and then retained Joseph as my representative I felt I was in good hands. When I emailed him with a question. I got a prompt response. We communicated often on the phone as needed. Joseph kept me informed as to the process. He made sure I knew all the potential results so I knew and could plan for the different outcomes. I know this his his job. But appreciate his professionalism and also his ability to not make me feel any extra stress. Well done.

N.B.
READ OUR REVIEWS
GET A FREE CONSULTATION