What is the difference between over 80 and .08?

By Last Updated: June 14, 2022

What is the difference between over 80 and 08If you provided sample of your breath and the machine said you blew over the legal limit, you have likely been charged with driving with a blood alcohol over the legal limit (s. 253(1)(b) of the Criminal Code). This is known as an “Over 80” or “Over .08” charge.

Impaired Driving and Driving Over 80 are charges frequently seen in tandem. In fact, any time someone is charged with Over 80, they are also charged with Impaired Driving unless the police messed up somehow.  The two offences share very similar offending conduct.  When someone drives with a blood alcohol level over the legal limit, their ability to operate a motor vehicle is typically deemed to be impaired.  Likewise, if a driver’s ability to operate a motor vehicle is impaired by alcohol, they will almost invariably blow over the legal limit.  Due to a legal principle that a person should not be convicted of multiple offences that share a very similar (if not identical) delict, you cannot be convicted of both the impaired driving and “Over 80” charge. If you have been charged with both offences, however, you have to beat both charges as they both carry the same mandatory minimum punishment.

Although there are several similarities between the two charges, and they often accompany one another, there are also some key differences.  Impaired driving refers to driving when your ability to do so is impaired by alcohol or a drug. You can be convicted of impaired driving even if your blood alcohol concentration is below the legal limit. If you have a low alcohol tolerance, your ability to drive may be impaired despite the fact that your blood alcohol content (BAC) is only 20. The opposite may be true for someone with a high alcohol tolerance whose BAC is 100, but whose ability to drive is not impaired due to their tolerance. This means that the individual who drove at 20 could be convicted of impaired driving, but the individual who drove at 100 would not.

The opposite is true for the driving “Over 80” charge, which is made out when your blood alcohol content is over the legal limit, regardless of whether or not your ability to drive was impaired. For this charge, an individual whose ability to drive is impaired but who blows 20 will not be convicted, and an individual whose ability to drive is not impaired but who blows 100 could be convicted.

Perhaps the biggest difference between the two charges from the defence perspective is the strategy involved in litigating them.  With impaired driving charges, for example, it doesn’t matter what you blow.  What really matters is how your driving and you appeared. It is the observations of civilian witnesses as to your driving, walking, talking, coordination, etc, that really carries the day.  Our job as defence lawyers is to either exclude or explain observations consistent with impairment, and flush out observations consistent with sobriety.

With “Over 80” cases, the only thing that matters is if the document that says what you blew is allowed to go into evidence.  Observations or impairment are insignificant, except as they impact the analysis of whether your “Charter” rights have been violated.  For a more thorough review of “Over 80” defences, continue to read the other frequently asked questions in this topic area.

As the above distinctions demonstrate, impaired driving defence is an extremely technical and complicated area of law. Retaining a criminal defence lawyer with demonstrated experience in this area will allow you to explore the best possible defences to these charges.

About The Author

Michael Oykhman

Managing Partner

Michael Oykhman is a senior lawyer and founder of Strategic Criminal Defence, a full-service criminal law firm with central law offices across Western Canada and Ontario.

My professional experience consists of countless court appearances and thousands of successful defences and satisfied clients. Over the last 10 years, I have worked to build a law office where all the lawyers share our collective experience, resources, and passion to help people. Our team approach to legal representation is client–rather than only law–centred. We look for opportunities to add value to our clients through strategic thinking and creative solutions.

Ask A Question

We endeavor to respond to questions within 24 hours. If your matter is urgent, please call our office or submit a request for a free consultation.

Client Reviews

Michael Oykhman is a very professional lawyer and the first time I spoke to him he asked about my situation and he gave me some very helpful advice and assistance and also told me his odds of winning this case. During the days I was in contact with micheal I could feel the level of professionalism of him and his team, he is able to respond back to you with any questions you have within 24 hours. In the end he was as successful in helping me win my case as he had initially promised me.If you are still struggling to find a lawyer, I highly recommend Michael Oykhman.


Please give yourself a favour and contact Mr. Michael Oykhman if you need any legal advice or if you are in a terrible situation. Even-tough, the odds are not in your favour, still they will go extra miles to help you out in bad situation and get you favourable outcome. Moreover, They will work on your file even after the business hours. I don’t have words to say thanks to Mr. Michael oykhman and Kiran Cheema who had worked on my file and get me out of trouble. I’m very grateful for your assistance and exceptional service. HIGHLY RECOMMENDED.


I am grateful that Ms. Moira McAvoy was my lawyer, and I remain thankful to her for everything. She made a successful resolution to my case possible. Ms. Moira McAvoy is a professional, trustworthy lawyer, and a compassionate person. She is an excellent listener and knowledgeable of the law. From the start, she was an excellent guide. I did not know anything about the legal system and court, and she outlined everything clearly in advance, so I could understand things. She never rushed me through anything. She spoke clearly, explained everything, considered what I said, and provided options and advice. She kept me up to date on new information, requirements, and deadlines. She was always positive and this helped so much.


Ryan Patmore and his team are simply the best. I was bullied by CPS in 2020 and it landed me with three separate charges, assault, refusal to blow and DUI, which all went down as I was parked at a friends. After some research and a conversation with Michael, he directed me towards Ryan and at the time I didn’t know that would be a game changer in my favour! He is honest, transparent, helpful and a brilliant mind. He successfully appealed my license suspension with ATSB and then proceeded to get the crown to dismiss all my charges before trial. I never had to step foot inside a courtroom. If you are in need of a criminal defence lawyer, don’t think twice, get in touch with this firm and ask for Ryan Patmore! The guy is an absolute saviour.


Joseph Beller, from the very beginning when I first contacted and then retained Joseph as my representative I felt I was in good hands. When I emailed him with a question. I got a prompt response. We communicated often on the phone as needed. Joseph kept me informed as to the process. He made sure I knew all the potential results so I knew and could plan for the different outcomes. I know this his his job. But appreciate his professionalism and also his ability to not make me feel any extra stress. Well done.