Election and Plea Lawyers in Toronto
What is an Election?
Whether you are released from custody on a bail order, or detained in custody, navigating the criminal justice system can be extremely daunting to do alone. There are numerous steps to the life cycle of a criminal charge within the court system. Some of those steps you’ve surely heard of and may even have some familiarity with, while others are undoubtedly new to you.
One important step is deciding, when applicable, where the trial will take place and whether it will be by judge and jury or by judge alone. How you or your loved one will be tried depends on multiple factors, including the classification of the offence, and, when applicable, elections made by the Crown and the accused. Election refers to the ability of the Crown and/or the accused to choose which court will have jurisdiction over a criminal charge.
Criminal offences are classified into three categories. The classification of the offence will impact the election(s) available.
- Summary: Offences falling into the summary offence category are typically considered less serious. Summary offences carry lower penalties than indictable offences with the maximum penalty generally being two years less a day and a $5000.00 fine. Summary conviction offences are tried in provincial court by a judge alone (without a jury). To find the Ontario Court of Justice (provincial courthouse) closest to you, please see here. Because summary offences are automatically tried in this way, the accused does not make an election.
- Indictable: Indictable offences are more serious and carry higher maximum sentences. Reflecting the more serious nature of the charges, the accused is put to an election, meaning they can choose how they are tried. The precise wording for the accused’s election is set out in section 536(2.1) of the Criminal Code of Canada (the “Code”).
- Hybrid: Hybrid offences are at the discretion of the Crown, meaning that the Crown can choose to try the offence either by indictment or by way of summary conviction. This is the main election that the Crown will make.
The primary election made by the prosecution is in the case of hybrid offences.
When an accused is charged with a hybrid offence, the Crown Prosecutor can elect to proceed by way of indictment, or they can elect to proceed summarily. When the Crown proceeds by way of summary conviction, the matter will be heard before the provincial court and the defence will not have an election. If the Crown proceeds by indictment, the accused will have an election, meaning they can choose the mode of trial.
The defence makes an election when the Crown proceeds by indictment. In this instance the defence will be able to choose whether the matter will be heard before the Ontario Court of Justice (Provincial Court) or whether it will be heard before the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. Where the defence elects to have their trial heard before the Ontario Superior Court, they will also have the right to choose whether they would like the trial to be heard before a judge and a jury, or a judge alone.
Whether you should elect to be tried by judge alone or by judge and jury depends heavily on your unique circumstances. Selecting a mode of trial is an important step in the criminal trial process and should be made in consultation with your experienced criminal defence lawyer.
For more information on the pros and cons of different modes of trial please see our elections FAQ.
Exceptions to the general election rule
If a crime is punishable by more than five years imprisonment, the prosecution may require that the trial is by judge and jury. This means that absent the prosecution’s consent, you cannot have a trial by judge alone. The main factor the prosecution must consider is whether a jury trial is in the public’s best interest. See section 568 of the Code.
Attorney General may require trial by jury
568 Even if an accused elects under section 536 or re-elects under section 561 to be tried by a judge or provincial court judge, the Attorney General may require the accused to be tried by a court composed of a judge and jury unless the alleged offence is one that is punishable with imprisonment for five years or less. If the Attorney General so requires, a judge or provincial court judge has no jurisdiction to try the accused under this Part and a preliminary inquiry must be held if requested under subsection 536(4), unless one has already been held.
If an election is available (even if you intend to plead guilty), you must elect to be tried by the court before which you intend to enter the plea.
What is a Plea?
In Canada, prior to proceeding to trial, you will have the opportunity to enter a plea of guilty or not guilty. Pleading guilty is a formal admission of guilt to the offence charged. In other words, you are consenting to a guilty verdict and waiving the trial process.
Criminal convictions have both immediate penalties and long-term negative consequences on your future. Depending on the crime, a guilty verdict may impact employment, housing, immigration status, your ability to travel and more. Moreover, social stigma is frequently attached to criminal convictions.
Even if you intend on accepting responsibility for an offence, it is important to consider all your options and the potential short- and long-term consequences. Good representation can greatly reduce the severity of the punishment you face.
Our criminal defence lawyers are skilled at coming to non-criminal resolutions. Even if it is not possible to reach such a resolution, our lawyers will work hard to defend you so that you are not saddled with the most severe consequences of a criminal conviction. To learn more about potential non-criminal resolutions, please visit our Resolutions page, or read our FAQ on resolutions and other sentencing options.
Criminal Trial FAQs
- What does making an “election” mean?
- I have already pleaded guilty or not guilty. Can I change my plea?
- How does a criminal trial work in Canada?
I would like to start by saying thank you to Dylan Finlay for all the great work he has done for me, I thought I was going to be dealing with a criminal record for the rest of my life and he managed to get me a criminal discharge on my case! He is on point and very professional, I would highly recommend Dylan Finlay to anybody who needs help with their criminal charges! Thank you once again Dylan!
Dylan Finley handled my case. Right from the start he was polite, professional, attentive and he delivered on all of his promises. I had a case where it was looking really bad for me. I did everything Dylan told me to do and he took care of the rest. My life was filled with stress and worry about the case. Dylan handled my case like a pro and I received the outcome that I desired. I highly recommend Dylan to anyone seeking a criminal defense lawyer. He has changed my life and given me the opportunity to have a bright future.
Dylan Finlay is a professional and effective criminal defence lawyer. Dylan was my lawyer for an assault charge and was excellent throughout the entire process. He advised me how to turn myself in and what to expect, and then helped me build a case while I waited for trial. He was responsive to my emails and his confidence and knowledge relieved my stress. Furthermore, he was reasonable priced for the quality of defence he provides. I am very thankful for his services and got a favourable result on my case. I highly recommend his services.
Dylan Finlay is an amazing legal representative and person.I was facing a challenging trial. After getting to speak with Dylan he alleviated all of my stress and concern that burdened me. He provided valuable knowledge and was very intelligent and that eased my stress of the approaching Trial Court Dates . He provided an abundance of research and paperwork, he just had that intelligent edge and legal insight that was commendable. He was very kind and a pleasure too speak with and very personable. Look no further! The legal services provided to me by Dylan was an absolute success. Dylan returned my life back to me. He got me out of a very challenging situation. No matter how much I would thank you Dylan, you are the best :)
Dylan was such a great lawyer to work with. I had consulted with other lawyers prior, but decided to hire him after our first meeting as he was extremely professional and provided better advice and information than the others had. He was able to have my case resolved so quickly, much faster than what I had expected and achieved the result we wanted. I truly feel that he went above and beyond for my case, which shows me how much he cares about his clients. Would definitely recommend if you are looking for a lawyer.