You only have 7 days to launch a review of your license suspension.

If you were handed a Notice of Administrative Penalty (NAP) at the roadside, the clock is already running. You have 7 days to request a SafeRoads Alberta review, and an IRS FAIL carries a 90-day driving ban, a further 12 months on an ignition interlock, a 30-day vehicle seizure and a $1,200 bill. There is no court date and no second chance to file.

Our Alberta Notice of Administrative Penalty dispute lawyers file the review, obtain the officer’s records and argue the grounds for cancellation in writing or at an oral hearing. We are the first firm to take an Immediate Roadside Sanctions case to the Supreme Court of Canada.

Reviews are handled virtually from Calgary and Edmonton for drivers anywhere in Alberta. Call 403-719-6410 today.

What is a Notice of Administrative Penalty?

A Notice of Administrative Penalty is the document a peace officer serves on you when an Immediate Roadside Sanction (IRS) is imposed under the Traffic Safety Act. Since December 1, 2020, the Provincial Administrative Penalties Act has moved most Alberta impaired driving cases out of criminal court and into this administrative system, run by SafeRoads Alberta. The NAP sets out the sanction, the suspension and the fine, and the licence suspension starts the moment it is served.

Strategic Criminal Defence is the first firm to bring an Immediate Roadside Sanctions case to the Supreme Court of Canada. Michael Oykhman is asking the Court to decide whether police can use a Criminal Code breath demand to impose a SafeRoads penalty after a driver has already been arrested. Read about the case here.

What has to be proven in a SafeRoads review?

A SafeRoads review is not a trial. Under section 7(1) of the Provincial Administrative Penalties Act you must file your request for review within 7 days after the NAP is issued and pay the review fee. An adjudicator then decides the review on the Director’s records and your submissions. The burden sits with you: you must prove, on a balance of probabilities, a ground for cancellation, such as that the officer lacked the grounds the section requires, that you were not told of your right to a second roadside test under section 88.11, or that the NAP does not meet the legislative requirements. The Director does not have to prove the contravention beyond a reasonable doubt, but the officer’s report, screening device records and any recordings must actually support the sanction. Where they do not, the adjudicator must cancel the NAP.

Types of Immediate Roadside Sanctions in Alberta

IRS FAIL (Traffic Safety Act s. 88.1)

Issued when a peace officer has reasonable grounds to believe you drove while impaired to any degree by alcohol or a drug, had a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more, failed a drug recognition evaluation, or failed or refused without reasonable excuse to comply with a demand under section 320.27 or 320.28 of the Criminal Code. First occurrence: 90-day suspension, then 12 months in the ignition interlock program, 30-day vehicle seizure, $1,000 fine plus 20 per cent victim fine surcharge, Planning Ahead course. Second: 36 months on interlock and a $2,000 fine. Third: lifetime suspension with interlock and a $2,000 fine.

IRS WARN (s. 88.03)

Issued when your blood alcohol concentration is between 0.05 and 0.079 or you fail a roadside sobriety test. First occurrence: 3-day suspension, 3-day vehicle seizure, $300 fine plus surcharge. Second: 15-day suspension, 7-day seizure, $600 fine and the Crossroads course. Third: 30-day suspension, 7-day seizure, $1,200 fine and the IMPACT program.

IRS ZERO Novice (s. 88.01)

Zero tolerance for alcohol or drugs for Class 7 learners and Class 5-GDL drivers. 30-day suspension, 7-day vehicle seizure, $200 fine plus surcharge.

IRS ZERO Commercial (s. 88.02)

Zero tolerance while operating a commercial vehicle. First occurrence: 3-day suspension and $300 fine. Second: 15 days and $600. Third: 30 days and $1,200, each plus surcharge.

IRS 24-Hour (s. 88)

A 24-hour suspension where the officer reasonably suspects alcohol, a drug or a medical condition is affecting your ability to drive. No fine, but a medical 24-hour can trigger a fitness-to-drive review.

Penalties at a glance (source: alberta.ca, Impaired driving penalties):

Sanction Occurrence Licence suspension Vehicle seizure Fine (plus 20% surcharge) Program
IRS FAIL 1st 90 days, then 12 months interlock 30 days $1,000 Planning Ahead
IRS FAIL 2nd 90 days, then 36 months interlock 30 days $2,000 IMPACT
IRS FAIL 3rd 90 days, then lifetime with interlock 30 days $2,000 IMPACT
IRS WARN 1st 3 days 3 days $300 None
IRS WARN 2nd 15 days 7 days $600 Crossroads
IRS WARN 3rd 30 days 7 days $1,200 IMPACT
IRS ZERO Novice Any 30 days 7 days $200 None
IRS ZERO Commercial 1st / 2nd / 3rd 3 / 15 / 30 days None $300 / $600 / $1,200 None

 

None of these sanctions is a criminal conviction, but every one of them goes on your driving abstract. If police also lay a Criminal Code charge, our impaired driving lawyers defend both files together.

Key Takeaways

  • A Notice of Administrative Penalty (NAP) is a provincial sanction under the Traffic Safety Act, not a Criminal Code charge, and carries no criminal record.
  • You have 7 days from the date the NAP is issued to request a SafeRoads Alberta review.
  • An IRS FAIL means a 90-day driving ban, 12 months on an interlock, a 30-day vehicle seizure and $1,200 in fine and surcharge on a first occurrence.
  • An adjudicator, not a judge, decides the review on the officer’s records and your written or oral submissions.
  • Common grounds for cancellation: no right to a second roadside test given, missing disclosure, an officer’s report that does not record signs of impairment, or a defective notice.
  • Reviews are handled virtually from our Calgary and Edmonton offices for drivers anywhere in Alberta. Call 403-719-6410.
IRS SafeRoads challenges are handled virtually across Alberta. This allows us to conduct defences from our centralized offices in Calgary or Edmonton. You do not need a lawyer in your jurisdiction.
IRS-CTA

How to dispute a Notice of Administrative Penalty in Alberta

The Provincial Administrative Penalties Act sets the process. Your request for review must be filed within 7 days of the NAP being issued, with only rare exceptions (usually medical). You choose a written review or an oral review, SafeRoads discloses the officer’s records, and we file your submissions and evidence through the SafeRoads portal. You do not attend court. The decision is issued in writing within 30 days of the NAP.

What most drivers get wrong in a SafeRoads review

Most people argue that they were not impaired. That rarely works, because the adjudicator decides on the records, not on a retelling of the night. The cases that get cancelled are won on what the records do and do not show: the officer’s report must record the grounds the section requires, the second-test advice, the device used and its results, and the Director must disclose the recordings that exist. Smit v Alberta (Director of SafeRoads), 2023 ABKB 435, confirms that fairness requires the Director to provide existing police audio and video or state that none exists. We read every page of disclosure before we write a word of argument. Call 403-719-6410 before you file anything on the portal.

Notice of Administrative Penalty Dispute Defences

The grounds that apply depend on the facts that led to the NAP. These are the five we argue most often.

Invalidity of the Notice of Administrative Penalty

The first issue an adjudicator decides is whether a valid NAP was served. Section 6 of the Provincial Administrative Penalties Act requires the notice to be in the prescribed form and to contain the prescribed content. In practice the adjudicator checks that the notice:

  1. Identifies you clearly;
  2. Specifies the right contravention;
  3. States the correct date of occurrence; and
  4. States the place (or near where) the contravention occurred.

No Proper Disclosure

When you request a review, the Director of SafeRoads Alberta must provide the records relating to the issuance of the NAP. Section 2 of the SafeRoads Alberta Regulation lists the records the Director must provide, including:

  1. A copy of the NAP;
  2. The report of the officer who issued the NAP (police notes or a typed report);
  3. Calibration and maintenance records of the device or instrument used to test your breath, urine or blood sample; and
  4. Any other relevant records, which after Smit includes existing in-car and body-worn recordings.

No Roadside Appeal or Second Test (s. 88.11)

You have the right to a roadside appeal: a second breath sample into a different approved screening device, even if the NAP was issued without a first test. Providing the sample is voluntary; telling you about the right is mandatory. A failure to advise you of the right, or a failure to meaningfully administer the second test, is a ground for cancellation.

Insufficient Evidence to Establish Impairment

For an impairment-based IRS FAIL the officer’s report must record enough to show impairment. The onus to record the signs is on the police. Reports often lack detail.

Signs of impairment an officer is expected to record include:

  • Slurred speech;
  • Poor balance;
  • Red, glassy or glossy eyes;
  • Flushed face;
  • Disorientation or confusion;
  • Poor hand-eye coordination; or
  • A driving pattern consistent with impairment.

Where the report does not record them, the adjudicator should conclude there is insufficient evidence to justify the sanction.

Mouth Alcohol in Relation to ASD Results

In some cases mouth alcohol, not blood alcohol, produced the FAIL reading. You must establish it with evidence of the volume and timing of consumption and the surrounding circumstances, such as having just left a bar or having open alcohol in the vehicle. It is a difficult ground, but the materials before the adjudicator set clear requirements for proper test administration, and a breach of them matters.

Read our comprehensive article on ways to beat an Immediate Roadside Sanction!

Consequences of a Notice of Administrative Penalty

SafeRoads fines run from $300 for a first IRS WARN to $2,000 for a second or later IRS FAIL, each plus a 20 per cent victim fine surcharge. An IRS WARN (0.05 to 0.079) costs $300 on a first occurrence; an IRS FAIL (0.08 or more, impairment, or refusal) costs $1,000 the first time and $2,000 every time after.

Beyond the fine, a NAP brings:

  • A licence suspension of 3 to 90 days, followed on an IRS FAIL by 12 months to life on an ignition interlock;
  • A vehicle seizure of 3 to 30 days, with towing and storage charged to you;
  • Mandatory courses: Planning Ahead, Crossroads or the IMPACT program;
  • An entry on your driver’s abstract that insurers read as an impaired driving occurrence, so premiums rise for years;
  • Loss of work for anyone who drives for a living, including Class 1 to 4 licence holders and commercial drivers under IRS ZERO;
  • A record that can surface on employer abstract checks even though it is not a criminal conviction and does not, on its own, create immigration or travel consequences.

If you request a review and lose, the $50 review fee is forfeited. If the NAP is cancelled, the fee is refunded. Our fee for the review is quoted up front. Call 403-719-6410 to find out what it would cost in your case.

Frequently Asked Questions

Pursuant to an Immediate Roadside Sanction (IRS) a driver can have their licence suspended for a set period of time due to an allegation of drug or alcohol-related impaired driving. These sanctions are administered under the Immediate Roadside Suspension Program that came into effect across Alberta on December 1, 2020, replacing the Alberta Administrative Licence Suspension program. The length and type of suspension will depend on the type of licence you have and the results of the police roadside screening. All suspensions are legislated in the Traffic Safety Act, which outlines the various procedures, beginning at section 88(1).

The Provincial Administrative Penalties Act outlines the appeal process of Notice of Administrative Penalties. The timeline in which to request a review (appeal) of your administrative penalty is brief. Your notice of appeal must be filed within seven days, with very few and rare exceptions (usually for medical reasons).

These administrative offences are challenged by way of written submissions, meaning you will not need to attend court. An accused can apply for a review of their suspension, schedule the review, and upload documents as their evidence on the SafeRoads online portal. After considering the evidence and submissions, SafeRoads will either uphold the licence suspension or cancel it.  In either case, they will notify an accused of their decision in writing within 30 days from the day the penalty was issued.

It is highly recommended that you hire an experienced lawyer to help you with disputing a Notice of Administrative Penalty. In preparation for the hearing, your lawyers will review police actions and the evidence against you, prepare the arguments (oral or written) for your review hearing, and assemble evidence to support your arguments. Then, they will argue before SafeRoads on your behalf, either in an oral hearing or with persuasive written arguments, that your licence suspension should be cancelled.

If you get a Notice of Administrative Penalty in Alberta, you only have seven days to file a dispute. You have to stick to this short timeline exactly. If you don’t meet the 7-day deadline, you usually can’t fight the penalty.

There are two separate systems for criminal charges and administrative penalties. They work in different ways and have different effects. SafeRoads Alberta, not the courts, handles administrative penalties. The Criminal Code of Canada says that cases of impaired driving that are criminal go to the criminal courts. If you are found guilty of these crimes, you will have a criminal record.

Yes, administrative penalties can make your insurance rates go up a lot, especially if you drive while impaired. Insurance companies in Alberta can look at your driver’s abstract to see if you have any administrative penalties. When they set rates, they treat these penalties the same way they do convictions.

Yes. An IRS WARN (0.05 to 0.079) is a 3-day suspension and a $300 fine on a first occurrence and escalates to 30 days on a third. An IRS FAIL (0.08 or more, impairment, or refusal) is a 90-day suspension plus 12 months on an interlock, a 30-day seizure and a $1,000 fine, and a third FAIL is a lifetime suspension. Both are disputed the same way, through a SafeRoads review within 7 days, but the stakes on a FAIL justify a lawyer every time.

Do not drive. Photograph every page of the NAP and the vehicle seizure notice, write down everything that happened from the stop to the paperwork, including whether you were offered a second test, and call 403-719-6410. Do not file the review yourself on the SafeRoads portal before speaking to a lawyer: the grounds you select and the submissions you upload shape the whole case, and the 7-day deadline runs from the date on the notice.

Published Decisions

Smit argued that the Director should have disclosed the police vehicle audio and video before her review, relying on s. 2(h) of the SafeRoads Alberta Regulation. The Court of King’s Bench held the adjudicator’s decision unreasonable and sent the NAP back for a new review: fairness requires the Director to provide any existing police audio or video, or to confirm that none exists.

You can read the full decision here.

This case is about the constitutional validity of s. 88.1 of the Alberta Traffic Safety Act, creating an administrative suspension of a driver’s licence upon being charged with impaired driving.

The court held the roadside administrative licence suspension enacted in the former s. 88.1 of the Alberta Traffic Safety Act breaches ss. 7 and 11 of the Charter and is not saved by s. 1. That provision was the old Administrative Licence Suspension that ran alongside a criminal charge. It was replaced by the current Immediate Roadside Sanctions regime on December 1, 2020, and the current s. 88.1 (IRS FAIL) is a different provision.

You can read the full decision here.

Ernst received a NAP for impaired operation and for a blood alcohol concentration over 80 mg per 100 ml. Applying Smit, the Court held the adjudicator’s confirmation of the NAP unreasonable for the same disclosure failure and ordered a rehearing before a different adjudicator.

You can read the full decision here.

Related driving offences

A NAP often arrives with, or instead of, a criminal charge. These pages cover the situations that most often overlap with a SafeRoads review.

Received a Notice of Administrative Penalty in Alberta?

You have 7 days. We file the review, pull the disclosure and argue the grounds, virtually, for drivers anywhere in Alberta. The consultation is free and we tell you up front whether your records show a ground worth fighting. Call 403-719-6410 or send a message using the form below.

michael-oykhman-thumb

Verified By: Michael Oykhman, Senior Criminal Defence Lawyer

Last Modified: November 9, 2026

Michael Oykhman is a senior criminal defence lawyer and the founder of Strategic Criminal Defence, a leading firm with offices across Western Canada and Ontario. With nearly 20 years of legal experience, he has appeared at all levels of court in Alberta, including the Supreme Court of Canada, and has successfully defended thousands of clients.

Experience

  • Proven Results: Successfully managed over 10,000 criminal cases, experience in complex matters such as impaired driving, domestic violence, and sexual assault.
  • Strategic Problem Solver: Trained as a trial lawyer but recognized for his experience in alternative resolution strategies, often securing the best outcomes for clients without a case ever going to trial.
  • Multi-Jurisdictional Authority: Licensed to practice law in Alberta, British Columbia, and Saskatchewan.

Education & Academic Leadership

  • Education: Holds a Bachelor of Laws (LL.B.) and a B.A. in Psychology from the University of Calgary.
  • Academic Distinctions: Recipient of the Crown Association Prize (top grade in criminal law) and was the first-ever finalist for the University of Calgary at the Gale Cup Moot.
  • Teaching & Mentorship: Currently serves as the Advising Lawyer for Student Legal Assistance and is a sessional instructor at the University of Calgary Faculty of Law, teaching Advanced Criminal/Constitutional Appellate Advocacy.

Credentials & Recognition

  • Top-Rated Advocacy: An 8-time recipient of the Three Best Rated® Top Criminal Defence Lawyer of the Year award in Calgary.
  • Professional Memberships: Active member of the Criminal Trial Lawyers Association (CTLA) and the Criminal Defence Lawyers Association (CDLA) of Calgary.
  • Connect with Michael: Bio | LinkedIn | Firm Office: (403) 719-6410